Discussion:
Helmet law to be reconsidered by City Council
(too old to reply)
DiscoDuck
2006-04-23 00:17:44 UTC
Permalink
It could happen here: Controversial helmet law to be reconsidered by
Port Townsend City Council .
Let it begin in BC.
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited/story/html/235667
TVC
2006-04-23 19:36:03 UTC
Permalink
I sent a message to the newspaper letting it know about the BMJ
article. Maybe they folks there will give it some publicity and help
support those trying to repeal the law.
DiscoDuck
2006-04-23 20:52:16 UTC
Permalink
well done.
Which newspaper?
Post by TVC
I sent a message to the newspaper letting it know about the BMJ
article. Maybe they folks there will give it some publicity and help
support those trying to repeal the law.
TVC
2006-04-25 01:47:48 UTC
Permalink
The Peninsular Daily News.
DiscoDuck
2006-04-25 03:51:19 UTC
Permalink
are you not in BC?
Post by TVC
The Peninsular Daily News.
TVC
2006-04-25 11:46:27 UTC
Permalink
No
TVC
2006-05-02 13:09:47 UTC
Permalink
Looks like the repeal is proceeding.

"Port Townsend council sets wheels in motion to repeal helmet law"
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited/story/html/236194
TVC
2006-05-16 13:09:36 UTC
Permalink
City did not repeal (yet) as it wants to retain the education
portion. The Mayor says they will repeal the helmet requirement after
the education isportion is implemented.

from http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited/story/html/257711

City Council does an about-face on bicycle helmet law repeal
2006-05-16
by JEFF CHEW

PORT TOWNSEND -- With Mayor Mark Welch swinging the City Council vote
4-3 Monday night against rescinding a controversial bicycle helmet
requirement, the council instead voted unanimously to develop a
comprehensive bicycle and motorist safety education program.

The safety education program is proposed to be devised by city staff in
60 to 90 days, at which time the council could choose whether the
proposal goes before the city Public Safety committee or Public
Transportation committee -- or both.

The action came after more than an hour of debate, with Welch riding
hard on bicycle and motorist education as being most important.

``I continue to not support a helmet law,'' Welch said.

The mayor said he was concerned that the education program would not be
developed expeditiously, and once that was done the council could then
repeal the bike helmet law.

``I want to see something happen in a brief amount of time,'' he said.

Original motion

Councilman Frank Benskin agreed with Welch, but Benskin's original
motion to postpone rescinding the helmet law until the city's Public
Safety Committee could address the matter failed.

``My motion is not a delaying tactic,'' Benskin said. ``I want to see
something happen.''

That motion failed 4-3, with Welch joining Michelle Sandoval, Scott
Walker and Catharine Robinson in opposition.

Sandoval, Walker and Robinson all supported rescinding the ordinance,
agreeing that they saw no use in it being left on the books while an
education program was devised.

``It was a bad law when it was passed last year,'' Sandoval said,
adding that it would remain bad if allowed to continue.
DiscoDuck
2006-05-16 17:39:53 UTC
Permalink
Well at least they acknowledge it is a bad law.
Post by TVC
City did not repeal (yet) as it wants to retain the education
portion. The Mayor says they will repeal the helmet requirement after
the education isportion is implemented.
from http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited/story/html/257711
City Council does an about-face on bicycle helmet law repeal
2006-05-16
by JEFF CHEW
PORT TOWNSEND -- With Mayor Mark Welch swinging the City Council vote
4-3 Monday night against rescinding a controversial bicycle helmet
requirement, the council instead voted unanimously to develop a
comprehensive bicycle and motorist safety education program.
The safety education program is proposed to be devised by city staff in
60 to 90 days, at which time the council could choose whether the
proposal goes before the city Public Safety committee or Public
Transportation committee -- or both.
The action came after more than an hour of debate, with Welch riding
hard on bicycle and motorist education as being most important.
``I continue to not support a helmet law,'' Welch said.
The mayor said he was concerned that the education program would not be
developed expeditiously, and once that was done the council could then
repeal the bike helmet law.
``I want to see something happen in a brief amount of time,'' he said.
Original motion
Councilman Frank Benskin agreed with Welch, but Benskin's original
motion to postpone rescinding the helmet law until the city's Public
Safety Committee could address the matter failed.
``My motion is not a delaying tactic,'' Benskin said. ``I want to see
something happen.''
That motion failed 4-3, with Welch joining Michelle Sandoval, Scott
Walker and Catharine Robinson in opposition.
Sandoval, Walker and Robinson all supported rescinding the ordinance,
agreeing that they saw no use in it being left on the books while an
education program was devised.
``It was a bad law when it was passed last year,'' Sandoval said,
adding that it would remain bad if allowed to continue.
DiscoDuck
2006-05-16 20:32:06 UTC
Permalink
I must say, it is nice not to have all the angry zealots out there
pouncing on us about this law. Perhaps they have seen the light in
regards to the principle of freedom of choice.
smn
2006-05-16 21:04:14 UTC
Permalink
U did that on purpose.: ) Now, I have to say Politicians are never right so
I would not count on this being a ground breaking development anyway.
In Surrey no one gets a ticket for riding on the sidewalk, not wearing a
helmut, or listening to a walkman instead of traffic although the law says
otherwise. Majority rules. And I still pay more than my share of drivers'
use of roads.
My 2 cents.
Post by DiscoDuck
I must say, it is nice not to have all the angry zealots out there
pouncing on us about this law. Perhaps they have seen the light in
regards to the principle of freedom of choice.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...